Peer review analysis provides independent scientific review of opposing experts’ methodologies, identifying flaws in data collection, analysis, or interpretation that can undermine opposing testimony. Comprehensive methodology assessment ensures that scientific claims meet peer-review standards and are based on accepted scientific principles. Data quality assessment evaluates whether opposing experts used sufficient, reliable data to support their conclusions. Literature review support identifies relevant scientific studies that support or contradict opposing claims. Report validation ensures that all scientific statements are properly supported by evidence and methodology. This thorough analysis provides attorneys with specific, scientifically sound challenges to opposing expert testimony while strengthening their own case through rigorous scientific standards.